4.7 Article

Probiotics in human gut microbiota can degrade host glycosaminoglycans

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-28886-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. Mizutani Foundation for Glycoscience
  3. Danone Institute of Japan Foundation
  4. Yakult Bio-science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) (e.g. heparin, chondroitin sulfate, and hyaluronan) show various significant physiological functions as a major component of extracellular matrix in animals. Some bacteria target GAGs for adhesion and/or infection to host cells, although no probiotics have been known to degrade GAGs. Here, we show GAG degradation by probiotics from human gut microbiota and their adhesion to human intestinal cells through a GAG. GAG-degrading bacteria were isolated from human faeces and identified as Enterococcus faecium, and some typical probiotics such as Lactobacillus casei, Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Enterococcus faecalis were also found to degrade heparin. GAG-degrading lactobacilli and enterococci including the isolated E. faecium possessed a genetic cluster encoding GAG-degrading/metabolising enzymes in the bacterial genome. KduI and KduD enzymes encoded in the GAG cluster of L. rhamnosus functioned as 4-deoxy-l-threo-5-hexosulose-uronate ketol-isomerase and 2-keto-3-deoxy-D-gluconate dehydrogenase, respectively, both of which were crucial for GAG metabolism. GAG-degrading L. rhamnosus and E. faecium attached to human intestinal Caco-2 cells via heparin. Some species of Bacteroides, considered to be the next generation probiotics, degraded chondroitin sulfate C and hyaluronan, and genes coding for the Bacteroides GAG-degrading enzyme were frequently detected from human gut microbiota. This is the first report on GAG-degrading probiotics in human gut microbiota.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available