4.7 Article

Variability of black carbon deposition to the East Antarctic Plateau, 1800-2000 AD

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages 3799-3808

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-12-3799-2012

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [0733089, 0538185, 0538416, 0538595]
  2. US National Science Foundation [152]
  3. Norwegian Polar Institute [152]
  4. Research Council of Norway [152]
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Office of Polar Programs (OPP) [944348] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  7. Division Of Polar Programs
  8. Directorate For Geosciences [0733089] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Refractory black carbon aerosols (rBC) from biomass burning and fossil fuel combustion are deposited to the Antarctic ice sheet and preserve a history of emissions and long-range transport from low- and mid-latitudes. Antarctic ice core rBC records may thus provide information with respect to past combustion aerosol emissions and atmospheric circulation. Here, we present six East Antarctic ice core records of rBC concentrations and fluxes covering the last two centuries with approximately annual resolution (cal. yr. 1800 to 2000). The ice cores were drilled in disparate regions of the high East Antarctic ice sheet, at different elevations and net snow accumulation rates. Annual rBC concentrations were log-normally distributed and geometric means of annual concentrations ranged from 0.10 to 0.18 mu g kg(-1). Average rBC fluxes were determined over the time periods 1800 to 2000 and 1963 to 2000 and ranged from 3.4 to 15.5 mu g m(-2) a(-1) and 3.6 to 21.8 mu g m(-2) a(-1), respectively. Geometric mean concentrations spanning 1800 to 2000 increased linearly with elevation at a rate of 0.025 mu g kg(-1)/500 m. Spectral analysis of the records revealed significant decadal-scale variability, which at several sites was comparable to decadal ENSO variability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available