4.7 Article

Multiscale Logarithm Difference Edgemaps for Face Recognition Against Varying Lighting Conditions

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 24, Issue 6, Pages 1735-1747

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2015.2409988

Keywords

Face recognition; multiple scales; difference edgemaps; uncontrolled lighting conditions

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61203248, 11171354, 90920007, 61375033, 61403164]
  2. Ministry of Education, China [SRFDP-20120171120007, 20120171110016]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [S2013020012796]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [13lgpy26]
  5. National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lambertian model is a classical illumination model consisting of a surface albedo component and a light intensity component. Some previous researches assume that the light intensity component mainly lies in the large-scale features. They adopt holistic image decompositions to separate it out, but it is difficult to decide the separating point between large-scale and small-scale features. In this paper, we propose to take a logarithm transform, which can change the multiplication of surface albedo and light intensity into an additive model. Then, a difference (substraction) between two pixels in a neighborhood can eliminate most of the light intensity component. By dividing a neighborhood into subregions, edgemaps of multiple scales can be obtained. Then, each edgemap is multiplied by a weight that can be determined by an independent training scheme. Finally, all the weighted edgemaps are combined to form a robust holistic feature map. Extensive experiments on four benchmark data sets in controlled and uncontrolled lighting conditions show that the proposed method has promising results, especially in uncontrolled lighting conditions, even mixed with other complicated variations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available