4.6 Article

Construction of g-C3N4 and FeWO4 Z-scheme photocatalyst: effect of contact ways on the photocatalytic performance

Journal

RSC ADVANCES
Volume 8, Issue 33, Pages 18419-18426

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ra02882f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Fund of China [21577008]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities [2016J004]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Photocatalysis has been regarded as an attractive strategy for the elimination of contaminants, but its performance is usually limited by the fast recombination of photogenerated electron-holes. A heterojunction photocatalyst could achieve the effective separation of electron-holes. However, the electrons migrate to the less negative band while holes move to the less positive band, leading to a weakened redox ability. Z-scheme photocatalysis is a feasible way to realize the efficient separation of photogenerated electron-holes without sacrificing the reductive ability of electrons and oxidative ability of holes. In this work, a new Z-scheme photocatalyst, composed of g-C3N4 (photocatalyst I), FeWO4 (photocatalyst II) and RGO (electron mediator), was fabricated through a facile hydrothermal and mixing method. The effect of contact ways (the electron mediator firstly combined with photocatalyst I or with photocatalyst II) on the Z-scheme photocatalytic performance was investigated. The photocatalytic removal rate of rhodamine B (RhB) was largely enhanced by the construction of a Z-scheme photocatalyst, compared with the g-C3N4/FeWO4 composite without RGO. The contact ways could affect the photocatalytic ability of a Z-scheme photocatalyst. The enhanced photocatalytic performance was attributed to the Z-scheme induced efficient separation of photogenerated charge carriers. Furthermore, remaining holes (on the VB of FeWO4) or remaining electrons (on the CB of g-C3N4) with powerful oxidation or reduction ability would promote the photocatalytic degradation of RhB.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available