4.3 Article

Development of the PEA-PODS (Perceptions of the Environment and Patterns of Diet at School) Survey for Students

Journal

PREVENTING CHRONIC DISEASE
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

CENTERS DISEASE CONTROL & PREVENTION
DOI: 10.5888/pcd15.170561

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Mid-Atlantic Nutritional Obesity Research Center (NORC) through SEED
  2. Summer Program in Obesity, Diabetes, and Nutrition Research Training (SPORT
  3. National Institutes of Health Grant) [T35DK095737]
  4. United States Department of Agriculture AFRI Childhood Obesity Grant [2016-68001-24927]
  5. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [F32DK115146]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Few instruments assess key outcomes of school-based obesity interventions, including student perceptions of school environments and school-specific dietary intake patterns. This study describes development of PEA-PODS (Perceptions of the Environment and Patterns of Diet at School), a 2-part survey to measure these outcomes. Methods Part 1 (PEA) assessed student perceptions of policies, physical environment, and practices related to healthy eating and physical activity at school. Part 2 (PODS) assessed usual intake (ie, frequency, location obtained, and foods consumed) of breakfast and lunch. Foods consumed were presented by MyPlate categories (eg, Fruits, Grains). Students in grades 3, 6, and 9 participated in 2 phases: cognitive pre-testing (n = 10) and reliability/validation testing (n = 58). Both surveys were administered 1 week apart to assess test-retest reliability and 5-day food records validated PODS. Analyses included percent agreement (70% = acceptable), Pearson correlations, and Cronbach alpha. Results Cognitive pre-testing provided feedback on content, length, and age-appropriateness. Percent agreements were acceptable for test-retest reliability of PEA (71%-96%). The final version included 34 items with Likert-type responses in 4 subscales (alpha >= 0.78). For PODS, agreement for breakfast and lunch location was >= 75% for both reliability and validation. For foods consumed at breakfast, reliability agreement ranged from 74% to 93%, and validation agreement from 68% to 91%. For foods consumed at lunch, agreement ranges were 76% to 95% and 73% to 88%, respectively. Conclusion Both parts of the instrument demonstrate acceptable reliability, and PODS demonstrates acceptable validity. This demonstrates appropriateness for assessing perceptions of the environment and usual dietary intake patterns for school-based obesity prevention initiatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available