4.7 Article

Empirical Waveform Decomposition and Radiometric Calibration of a Terrestrial Full-Waveform Laser Scanner

Journal

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2014.2320134

Keywords

Calibration; full waveform; Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR); reflectance; remote sensing

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy
  2. CRREL
  3. Directorate For Geosciences
  4. Division Of Earth Sciences [1043051] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  5. Directorate For Geosciences
  6. Division Of Earth Sciences [1339015] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The parametric models used in Light Detection And Ranging (LiDAR) waveform decomposition routines are inherently estimates of the sensor's system response to backscattered laser pulse power. This estimation can be improved with an empirical system response model, yielding reduced waveform decomposition residuals and more precise echo ranging. We develop an empirical system response model for a Riegl VZ-400 terrestrial laser scanner, from a series of observations to calibrated reflectance targets, and present a numerical least squaresmethod for decomposing waveforms with the model. The target observations are also used to create an empirical radiometric calibration model that accommodates a nonlinear relationship between received optical power and echo peak amplitude, and to examine the temporal stability of the instrument. We find that the least squares waveform decomposition based on the empirical system response model decreases decomposition fitting errors by an order of magnitude for high-amplitude returns and reduces range estimation errors on planar surfaces by 17% over a Gaussian model. The empirical radiometric calibration produces reflectance values self-consistent to within 5% for several materials observed at multiple ranges, and analysis of multiple calibration data sets collected over a one-year period indicates that echo peak amplitude values are stable to within +/- 3% for target ranges up to 125 m.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available