4.8 Article

A marine heatwave drives massive losses from the world's largest seagrass carbon stocks

Journal

NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 8, Issue 4, Pages 338-+

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0096-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CSIRO Flagship Marine and Coastal Carbon Biogeochemical Cluster
  2. CSIRO Flagship Collaboration Fund
  3. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
  4. Generalitat de Catalunya [2014 SGR-1356, 2014 SGR-120]
  5. Obra Social 'LaCaixa'
  6. ARC DECRA [DE170101524]
  7. IAS-UWA
  8. Medshift project [CGL2015-71809-P]
  9. US National Science Foundation through the Florida Coastal Everglades Long-Term Ecological Research programme [DEB-1237517]
  10. Hodgkin Trust Top-up Scholarship
  11. [UKM-DIP-2017-005]
  12. Division Of Environmental Biology
  13. Direct For Biological Sciences [1237517] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Seagrass ecosystems contain globally significant organic carbon (C) stocks. However, climate change and increasing frequency of extreme events threaten their preservation. Shark Bay, Western Australia, has the largest C stock reported for a seagrass ecosystem, containing up to 1.3% of the total C stored within the top metre of seagrass sediments worldwide. On the basis of field studies and satellite imagery, we estimate that 36% of Shark Bay's seagrass meadows were damaged following a marine heatwave in 2010/2011. Assuming that 10 to 50% of the seagrass sediment C stock was exposed to oxic conditions after disturbance, between 2 and 9 Tg CO2 could have been released to the atmosphere during the following three years, increasing emissions from land-use change in Australia by 4-21% per annum. With heatwaves predicted to increase with further climate warming, conservation of seagrass ecosystems is essential to avoid adverse feedbacks on the climate system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available