Journal
NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE
Volume 8, Issue 3, Pages 252-+Publisher
NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-018-0089-x
Keywords
-
Funding
- Danish Natural Science Research Council [4090-00227]
- vetenskabsradet (The Swedish research council) [2017-03862]
- Spanish Research Council (CSIC)
- Danish Natural Science Research Council
- [AAG-MAA/3764/2014]
- Swedish Research Council [2017-03862] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Forecasts of species range shifts under climate change most often rely on ecological niche models, in which characterizations of climate suitability are highly contingent on the species range data used. If ranges are far from equilibrium under current environmental conditions, for instance owing to local extinctions in otherwise suitable areas, modelled environmental suitability can be truncated, leading to biased estimates of the effects of climate change. Here we examine the impact of such biases on estimated risks from climate change by comparing models of the distribution of North American mammals based on current ranges with ranges accounting for historical information on species ranges. We find that estimated future diversity, almost everywhere, except in coastal Alaska, is drastically underestimated unless the full historical distribution of the species is included in the models. Consequently forecasts of climate change impacts on biodiversity for many clades are unlikely to be reliable without acknowledging anthropogenic influences on contemporary ranges.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available