4.1 Article

Estimation of stature from hand and foot dimensions in a Korean population

Journal

JOURNAL OF FORENSIC AND LEGAL MEDICINE
Volume 55, Issue -, Pages 87-92

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jflm.2018.02.011

Keywords

Forensic science; Forensic anthropology; Stature estimation; Hand dimension; Foot dimension

Funding

  1. BK21 Plus Program (Centre for Sustainable and Innovative Industrial Systems) - Ministry of Education, South Korea [21A20130012638]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The estimation of stature using foot and hand dimensions is essential in the process of personal identification. The shapes of feet and hands vary depending on races and gender, and it is of great importance to design an adequate equation in consideration of variances to estimate stature. This study is based on a total of 5,195 South Korean males and females, aged from 20 to 59 years. Body dimensions of stature, hand length, hand breadth, foot length, and foot breadth were measured according to standard anthropometric procedures. The independent t-test was performed in order to verify significant gender-induced differences and the results showed that there was significant difference between males and females for all the foot-hand dimensions (p<0.01). All dimensions showed a positive and statistically significant relation with stature in both genders (p<0.01). For both genders, the foot length showed highest correlation, whereas the hand breadth showed least correlation. The stepwise regression analysis was conducted, and the results showed that males had the highest prediction accuracy in the regression equation consisting of foot length and hand length (R-2=0.532), whereas females had the highest accuracy in the regression model consisting of foot length and hand breadth (R-2=0.437) The findings of this study indicated that hand and foot dimensions can be used to predict the stature of South Korean in the forensic science field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available