4.2 Article

Intraoperative feasibility of bulbocavernosus reflex monitoring during untethering surgery in infants and children

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MONITORING AND COMPUTING
Volume 33, Issue 1, Pages 155-163

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s10877-018-0127-2

Keywords

Bulbocavernosus reflex; Monitoring; Untethering surgery; Urinary and bowel dysfunction; Infants; Children

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bulbocavernosus reflex (BCR) monitoring is used to assess the integrity of urinary and bowel function. In this study, we evaluated the feasibility of BCR monitoring during untethering surgery in infants and children to predict postoperative urinary and bowel dysfunction. The records of 22 patients ranging from 4 days to 10 years old (mean 2.7 +/- 3.3 years) were reviewed. Anesthesia was maintained by propofol or sevoflurane/opioid without neuromuscular blockade. BCR waveforms induced by electrical stimulation (20-40 mA, train-of-four pulses with 500 Hz) to the penis or clitoris were recorded from bilateral external anal sphincters. To assess the sensitivity and specificity of BCR monitoring, we investigated the association between a significant continuous decrease in BCR amplitude at the end of surgery and postoperative urinary and bowel dysfunction after surgery. Reproducible baseline BCR waveforms were successfully recorded in 20 of 22 patients (90.9%). A significant continuous decrease in BCR amplitude was observed in 8 patients. The results of intraoperative BCR monitoring included three true-positives, twelve true-negatives, five false-positives, and zero false-negatives. Therefore, the sensitivity and specificity of BCR monitoring used to predict postoperative urinary and bowel dysfunction were 100 and 70.6%, respectively. BCR monitoring during untethering surgery in infants and children under general anesthesia was found to be a feasible method to prevent postoperative urinary and bowel dysfunction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available