4.7 Article

An Efficient Approach to Nondominated Sorting for Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION
Volume 19, Issue 2, Pages 201-213

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEVC.2014.2308305

Keywords

Computational complexity; evolutionary multiobjective optimization; nondominated sorting; Pareto-optimality

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61272152, 61033003, 91130034, 61373066, 61073116, 61003131, 61202011]
  2. Ph.D. Programs Foundation, Ministry of Education of China [20100142110072]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2010ZD001]
  4. Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Higher Education Institutions of China [KJ2012A010, KJ2013A007]
  5. Scientific Research Foundation for Doctor of Anhui University [02203104]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Evolutionary algorithms have been shown to be powerful for solving multiobjective optimization problems, in which nondominated sorting is a widely adopted technique in selection. This technique, however, can be computationally expensive, especially when the number of individuals in the population becomes large. This is mainly because in most existing nondominated sorting algorithms, a solution needs to be compared with all other solutions before it can be assigned to a front. In this paper we propose a novel, computationally efficient approach to nondominated sorting, termed efficient nondominated sort (ENS). In ENS, a solution to be assigned to a front needs to be compared only with those that have already been assigned to a front, thereby avoiding many unnecessary dominance comparisons. Based on this new approach, two nondominated sorting algorithms have been suggested. Both theoretical analysis and empirical results show that the ENS-based sorting algorithms are computationally more efficient than the state-of-the-art nondominated sorting methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available