4.6 Article

A Vanadium-Redox-Flow-Battery Model for Evaluation of Distributed Storage Implementation in Residential Energy Systems

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION
Volume 30, Issue 2, Pages 421-430

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TEC.2014.2369437

Keywords

Energy storage; renewable energy systems; residential application; vanadium-redox-flow battery (VRFB)

Funding

  1. Dezentrale Speicher fur Gebaude DeSG Project
  2. Optimierte Fernuberwachung und Steuerung dezentraler Energiesysteme durch den Einsatz von Cloud-Computing-Diensten OFEC Project
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF [FKZ 17N1611]
  4. European Union
  5. Government of Lower Saxony [EFRE ZW 6-80131094]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A vanadium-redox-flow-battery (VRFB) model suitable for annual energy feasibility analyses of distributed storage implementation is presented in this paper. The validation of the proposed 6-kW/20-kWh VRFB semiempirical model, which takes into account auxiliary power consumption and operational aspects such as startup and standby behavior, is reported. The comparison between the simulation and the experimental results shows a good matching, quantified by the maximum root-mean-square deviation of the stack energy equal to 1.57% and 2.47% during charge and discharge, respectively. Moreover, the VRFB model is used in an application model of a residential building including a photovoltaic system and heat pump. Based on variation of control parameters, the energy efficiency for the proposed application has been maximized. Finally, a comparison with a scaled VRFB model (3 kW/10 kWh) is discussed with respect to the increase of the VRFB utilization and overall energy efficiency, confirming the effectiveness of the proposed model for distributed energy storage sizing and management in residential systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available