4.7 Article

Effect of adding oat bran to instant oatmeal on glycaemic response in humans - a study to establish the minimum effective dose of oat β-glucant

Journal

FOOD & FUNCTION
Volume 9, Issue 3, Pages 1692-1700

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7fo01768e

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DSM
  2. PepsiCo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Reducing the glycaemic response to carbohydrate-containing foods may have desirable physiological effects for many people. Here, we aimed to determine the minimum amount of oat p-glucan from oat bran which, when added to instant-oatmeal, would reduce the glycaemic response by 20% compared to a ii-glucan-free cereal. Therefore, the glycaemic responses elicited by one serving (27 g) instant-oatmeal plus 247 g 2% milk (10, 28 g available-carbohydrate, 1.2 g (i-glucan) or 10 plus 0.2, 0.4, 0.8 or 1.6 g oat p-glucan (OBG) from oat-bran, or an available-carbohydrate matched portion of cream of rice (CR) plus milk were measured over 2 h in n = 40 subjects using a randomized, cross-over design. The primary endpoint was incremental area under the curve (iAUC). The secondary endpoint was glucose peak-rise. The results showed that grams OBG consumed were significantly correlated with mean iAUC (p = 0.009) and with mean glucose peak-rise (p = 0.002). Each gram of OBG reduced iAUC by 7% and peak-rise by 15%. Thus, to achieve a >20% reduction in iAUC relative to CR, 1.6 g OBG had to be added to 10 (74 +/- 7 vs. 93 +/- 6 mmol min L-1, p < 0.05), but, to achieve a 20% reduction in peak-rise, only 0.4 g OBG was required (2.00 +/- 0.1 vs. 2.40 +/- 0.1 mmol, p < 0.05). We conclude that adding OBG to 10 flattened postprandial glycaemic responses in a dose-dependent fashion; 1.6 g OBG was required to reduce iAUC by >20% versus CR, but a 20% reduction in peak-rise required only 0.4 g. The greater effect of OGB on peak-rise than iAUC presumably reflects the way viscous dietary fibres modulate glucose absorption kinetics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available