4.7 Article

Prebiotic effects of resistant starch from purple yam (Dioscorea alata L.) on the tolerance and proliferation ability of Bifidobacterium adolescentis in vitro

Journal

FOOD & FUNCTION
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 2416-2425

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7fo01919j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31271913]
  2. High Level University Construction Project of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University [612014042]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The in vitro prebiotic effects of resistant starch (RS), prepared by different treatments from purple yam, on Bifidobacterium adolescentis (bifidobacteria for short), were investigated. Tolerance tests indicated that bifidobacteria in PDS (prepared by debranching combined with autoclaving) and PDS.H (PDS further treated by double enzyme hydrolysis) media adapted better to simulated upper gastrointestinal conditions (at pH 1.5-3.0 and 0.3% and 1.0% bile acid) than those in GLU (glucose) and DAS (prepared by autoclaving) media. PDS.H, which had the highest digestion resistibility, exhibited significant effects on the OD600 (nm) value (1544) and the pH value (4.21) when the carbohydrate concentration was 20 g L-1. Additionally, the exponential growth phase of bifidobacteria was 2 h in the PDS or PDS.H media, whereas it was 4 h in the GLU or DAS media. A higher content of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) was obtained in the PDS.H medium. Analysis of the structural features of RS and fermented RS indicated that PDS, especially PDS.H, had a rougher surface and higher crystallinity than DAS. Fermented RS in a simulated large bowel environment showed an eroded surface and decreased crystallinity. All of these findings suggest that RS with a rough surface and perfect crystalline structure could protect bifidobacteria from gastrointestinal conditions and enhance the proliferation of bifidobacteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available