4.5 Article

Why do farmers abandon jatropha cultivation? The case of Chiapas, Mexico

Journal

ENERGY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 77-86

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.esd.2017.10.004

Keywords

Jatropha; Disadoption; Subsidy; Perception; Profitability; Biofuel

Funding

  1. Belgian Development Cooperation [BDC]
  2. Spanish National Institute for Agricultural Research [INIA]
  3. Swiss Agency for Development and Cooperation [SDC]
  4. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBSRC]
  5. BBSRC [BB/H009655/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/H009655/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biofuel crop Jatropha curcas has been promoted in developing countries as a means of improving the livelihoods of rural populations. In Mexico, despite the initially assumed economic, environmental, and social benefits of the crop, many farmers have abandoned jatropha cultivation. Here, we analyse the factors that influence farmers' decision to abandon jatropha cultivation by using a generalized linear modelling approach in combination with qualitative research methods. The deterioration in perception of jatropha profitability, the non-payment of expected subsidies and the wealth position of the household played a major role in determining abandonment. The perception of pest and disease damage, although stated by farmers as the second most frequent reason to disadopt, was not correlated with this decision in the generalized linear model. This research might help energy policy makers in identifying key elements to prevent failure of promotion programmes. The result of this study also may be useful for an international audience to reflect on the appropriateness of promoting a new crop at the farmer level before realistically evaluating the economic viability of its cultivation. (c) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available