4.7 Article

Targeted Therapies for Targeted Populations: Anti-EGFR Treatment for EGFR-Amplified Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma

Journal

CANCER DISCOVERY
Volume 8, Issue 6, Pages 696-713

Publisher

AMER ASSOC CANCER RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-1260

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH [K23 CA178203, P30 CA014599]
  2. University of Chicago Comprehensive Cancer Center (UCCCC) Award in Precision Oncology
  3. Live Like Katie (LLK) Foundation Award
  4. Castle Foundation Award
  5. Sal Ferrara II Fund for PANGEA
  6. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [P30CA014599, K23CA178203] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Previous anti-EGFR trials in unselected patients with gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA) were resoundingly negative. We identified EGFR amplification in 5% (19/363) of patients at the University of Chicago, including 6% (8/140) who were prospectively screened with intention-to-treat using anti-EGFR therapy. Seven patients received >= 1 dose of treatment: three first-line FOLFOX plus ABT-806, one second-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab, and three third/fourth-line cetuximab alone. Treatment achieved objective response in 58% (4/7) and disease control in 100% (7/7) with a median progression-free survival of 10 months. Pretreatment and posttreatment tumor next-generation sequencing (NGS), serial plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) NGS, and tumor IHC/FISH for EGFR revealed preexisting and/or acquired genomic events, including EGFR-negative clones, PTEN deletion, KRAS amplification/mutation, NRAS, MYC, and HER2 amplification, and GNAS mutations serving as mechanisms of resistance. Two evaluable patients demonstrated interval increase of CD3(+) infiltrate, including one who demonstrated increased NKp46(+), and PD-L1 IHC expression from baseline, suggesting an immune therapeutic mechanism of action. EGFR amplification predicted benefit from anti-EGFR therapy, albeit until various resistance mechanisms emerged. (c) 2018 AACR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available