Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.The misoprostol vaginal insert compared with oral misoprostol for labor induction in term pregnancies: a pair-matched case-control study
Moritz Doebert et al.
JOURNAL OF PERINATAL MEDICINE (2018)
Analysis of intravaginal misoprostol 0.2 mg versus intracervical dinoprostone 0.5 mg doses for labor induction at term pregnancies
Teresa Gornisiewicz et al.
GINEKOLOGIA POLSKA (2017)
Changes in induction methods have not influenced cesarean section rates among women with induced labor
Malin Dogl et al.
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA (2016)
Initial clinical experience with a misoprostol vaginal insert in comparison with a dinoprostone insert for inducing labor
Richard Bernhard Mayer et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY (2016)
Meta-analysis of Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for cervical ripening
Wenhang Chen et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS (2015)
Quality assurance: The 10-Group Classification System (Robson classification), induction of labor, and cesarean delivery
Michael Robson et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS (2015)
Neonatal and Maternal Outcomes With Prolonged Second Stage of Labor
S. Katherine Laughon et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2014)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert and Time to Vaginal Delivery A Randomized Controlled Trial
Deborah A. Wing et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2013)
Defining uterine tachysystole: how much is too much?
Robert D. Stewart et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2012)
Misoprostol Vaginal Insert for Successful Labor Induction A Randomized Controlled Trial
Deborah A. Wing et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2011)
Is preeclampsia associated with an increased risk of cesarean delivery if labor is induced?
Lena Heesun Kim et al.
JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE (2010)
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour
G. Justus Hofmeyr et al.
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS (2010)
Factors Predicting Successful Labor Induction With Dinoprostone and Misoprostol Vaginal Inserts
Leo Pevzner et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2009)
Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone
A. A. Calder et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2008)
Labor progression and risk of cesarean delivery in electively induced nulliparas
A Vahratian et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2005)
A randomised controlled trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal gel for inducing labour at term
S Gregson et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2005)
A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction
N van Gemund et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2004)
Indications for cesarean deliveries in Norway
T Kolås et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2003)
Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction
DA Wing et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2002)
Share Paper
