4.6 Article

Degradation of PLA/ZnO and PHBV/ZnO composites prepared by melt processing

Journal

ARABIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY
Volume 11, Issue 3, Pages 343-352

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.arabjc.2017.07.001

Keywords

Polylactide; Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate); Nano ZnO; Melt processing; Degradation stability

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency [P2-0145]
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology of the Republic of Slovenia [P2-0145]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Composites of polylactide (PLA) or poly(3-hydroxybutyrate-co-3-hydroxyvalerate) (PHBV) and ZnO nanoparticles (nZnO) were prepared by melt processing. During extrusion and moulding nano ZnO formed aggregates with sizes between 0.5 and 5 lm in PLA and between 0.5 and 15 lm in PHBV. Nano ZnO acted as a disruptor of PLA crystallization process and shifted the polymer glass transition temperature to lower temperatures. This was explained by degradation of PLA polymer chains during melt processing. SEC, FTIR and H-1 NMR confirmed that PLA degradation was correlated to nZnO concentration. The effect of nZnO on crystallization of PHBV matrix was much less intense which was shown by TGA. On the other hand, PHBV showed significantly lower thermal stability than PLA. ZnO participated as a reactant and an accelerator in the degradation reaction of PLA and at a smaller extent with PHBV. The results of this study revealed that addition of pure nZnO in concentrations higher than 0.1 wt.% is not recommended for the preparation of PLA/nZnO composites by melt processing while in the case of PHBV the nZnO concentration may be higher but it should not exceed 1.0 wt.%. The exposure time of these materials to high temperatures during melt processing should also be minimized. (C) 2017 The Authors. Production and hosting by Elsevier B. V. on behalf of King Saud University. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-NDlicense.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available