4.6 Article

Engineering Electrical Interfaces to Silicon via Indium Solder

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume 62, Issue 6, Pages 1977-1983

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2015.2421413

Keywords

Indium; reverse bias; Schottky diode; soldering

Funding

  1. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA [FA9550-05-C-0059]
  2. U.S. Department of Defense, Air Force Office of Scientific Research, National Defense Science and Engineering Graduate Fellowship [32 CFR 168a]
  3. Institutional Post-Doctoral Account [40362/ENG INST PD 25]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy through the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA, USA [DE-AC52-07NA27344 (LLNL-JRNL-655492)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper provides engineering models of a simple and robust approach for creating electrical connections to silicon using reduced temperature (<200 degrees C substrate) soldering. This removes a significant hurdle to the fabrication of high performance, custom silicon piezoresistors. The approach focuses on reducing the resistance of diodes that are undergoing reverse bias behavior, commonly considered to be unacceptable for electrical connections. Reverse bias Schottky barrier analytical models based on quantum mechanical first principles are developed to explain how the behavior is affected by doping, soldering temperature, and geometry. This understanding is encapsulated within parametric models that enable rapid design and optimization of the electrical contacts to silicon. Using this model, one may design contacts for practical applications that do not require the conventional microfabrication processing or the high-temperature processing. Indium solder is found to be the best solder for this process, with ohmic contact resistances of approximate to 1 Omega-cm(2) for < 110 > p-type wafers at 10(17) cm(-3) doping.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available