4.8 Article

Obtaining Large Columnar CdTe Grains and Long Lifetime on Nanocrystalline CdSe, MgZnO, or CdS Layers

Journal

ADVANCED ENERGY MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/aenm.201702666

Keywords

CdTe; grain boundaries; recombination; solar energy; thin films

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC36-08GO28308, XEU-2-22078-01, 3323]
  2. Directorate For Engineering
  3. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1538733] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. Directorate For Engineering
  5. Div Of Industrial Innovation & Partnersh [1540007] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CdTe solar cells have reached efficiencies comparable to multicrystalline silicon and produce electricity at costs competitive with traditional energy sources. Recent efficiency gains have come partly from shifting from the traditional CdS window layer to new materials such as CdSe and MgZnO, yet substantial headroom still exists to improve performance. Thin film technologies including Cu(In,Ga)Se-2, perovskites, Cu2ZnSn(S,Se)(4), and CdTe inherently have many grain boundaries that can form recombination centers and impede carrier transport; however, grain boundary engineering has been difficult and not practical. In this work, it is demonstrated that wide columnar grains reaching through the entire CdTe layer can be achieved by aggressive postdeposition CdTe recrystallization. This reduces the grain structure constraints imposed by nucleation on nanocrystalline window layers and enables diverse window layers to be selected for other properties critical for electro-optical applications. Computational simulations indicate that increasing grain size from 1 to 7 mu m can be equivalent to decreasing grain-boundary recombination velocity by three orders of magnitude. Here, large high-quality grains enable CdTe lifetimes exceeding 50 ns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available