4.6 Article

Properties of Self-Aligned Short-Channel Graphene Field-Effect Transistors Based on Boron-Nitride-Dielectric Encapsulation and Edge Contacts

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTRON DEVICES
Volume 62, Issue 12, Pages 4316-4320

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TED.2015.2482823

Keywords

Graphene field-effect transistor (GFET); heterostructures; quantum capacitance; virtual source (VS)

Funding

  1. Semiconductor Research Corporation within the Nanoelectronics Research Initiative through the INDEX Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present the characterization of ballistic graphene field-effect transistors (GFETs) with an effective oxide thickness of 3.5 nm. Graphene channels are fully encapsulated within hexagonal boron nitride, and self-aligned contacts are formed to the edge of the single-layer graphene. Devices of channel lengths (L-G) down to 67 nm are fabricated, and a virtual-source transport model is used to model the resulting current-voltage characteristics. The mobility and sourceinjection velocity as a function of L-G yields a mean-free-path, ballistic velocity, and effective mobility of 850 nm, 9.3x10(7) cm/s, and 13 700 cm(2)/Vs, respectively, which are among the highest velocities and mobilities reported for GFETs. Despite these best-in-class attributes, these devices achieve transconductance (g(m)) and output conductance (g(ds)) of only 600 and 300 mu S/mu m, respectively, due to the fundamental limitations of graphene's quantum capacitance and zero-bandgap. gm values, which are less than those of comparable ballistic silicon devices, benefit from the high ballistic velocity in graphene but are degraded by an effective gate capacitance reduced by the quantum capacitance. The gds values, which limit the effective power gain achievable in these devices, are significantly worse than comparable silicon devices due to the properties of the zero-bandgap graphene channel.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available