4.8 Article

Bifunctional immune checkpoint-targeted antibody-ligand traps that simultaneously disable TGF beta enhance the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02696-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01 CA184199, SPORE P50 DE019032]
  2. Maryland Innovation Initiative ('MII') award from the Maryland Technology Development Corporation (TEDCO)
  3. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [R01CA184199] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER
  4. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF DENTAL & CRANIOFACIAL RESEARCH [P50DE019032] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A majority of cancers fail to respond to immunotherapy with antibodies targeting immune checkpoints, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) or programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-1 ligand (PD-L1). Cancers frequently express transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta), which drives immune dysfunction in the tumor microenvironment by inducing regulatory T cells (Tregs) and inhibiting CD8(+) and T(H)1 cells. To address this therapeutic challenge, we invent bifunctional antibody-ligand traps (Y-traps) comprising an antibody targeting CTLA-4 or PD-L1 fused to a TGF beta receptor II ectodomain sequence that simultaneously disables autocrine/paracrine TGF beta in the target cell microenvironment (alpha-CTLA4-TGF beta RIIecd and alpha-PDL1-TGF beta RIIecd). alpha-CTLA4-TGF beta RIIecd is more effective in reducing tumor-infiltrating Tregs and inhibiting tumor progression compared with CTLA-4 antibody (Ipilimumab). Likewise, alpha-PDL1-TGF beta RIIecd exhibits superior antitumor efficacy compared with PD-L1 antibodies (Atezolizumab or Avelumab). Our data demonstrate that Y-traps counteract TGF beta-mediated differentiation of Tregs and immune tolerance, thereby providing a potentially more effective immunotherapeutic strategy against cancers that are resistant to current immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available