4.8 Article

In utero nanoparticle delivery for site-specific genome editing

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04894-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Brain Research Foundation Scientific Innovations Award [BRF SIA-2014-02]
  2. NIGMS Medical Scientist Training Program [T32GM07205]
  3. National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute [F30HL134252, R01HL125892]
  4. Ohse Research Grant, Yale School of Medicine, Department of Surgery
  5. American Pediatric Surgical Association Foundation Grant
  6. DSF Charitable Foundation
  7. Beckman Scholars Award
  8. National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases [U54DK106857]
  9. [5T32GM007223-43]
  10. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  11. Division Of Chemistry [1609159] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic diseases can be diagnosed early during pregnancy, but many monogenic disorders continue to cause considerable neonatal and pediatric morbidity and mortality. Early intervention through intrauterine gene editing, however, could correct the genetic defect, potentially allowing for normal organ development, functional disease improvement, or cure. Here we demonstrate safe intravenous and intra-amniotic administration of polymeric nanoparticles to fetal mouse tissues at selected gestational ages with no effect on survival or postnatal growth. In utero introduction of nanoparticles containing peptide nucleic acids (PNAs) and donor DNAs corrects a disease-causing mutation in the beta-globin gene in a mouse model of human beta-thalassemia, yielding sustained postnatal elevation of blood hemoglobin levels into the normal range, reduced reticulocyte counts, reversal of splenomegaly, and improved survival, with no detected off-target mutations in partially homologous loci. This work may provide the basis for a safe and versatile method of fetal gene editing for human monogenic disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available