4.8 Article

DNA methyltransferase inhibition upregulates MHC-I to potentiate cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses in breast cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02630-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. V Foundation for Cancer Research [V2016-012]
  2. China Scholarship Council [201406205050]
  3. NIH/NCI [R00CA181491]
  4. Susan G. Komen for the Cure Foundation [CCR14299052]
  5. Breast Cancer Specialized Program of Research Excellence (SPORE) [P50 CA098131]
  6. Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA68485]
  7. Kleburg Foundation
  8. Trans-Institutional Programs (TIPS) award
  9. Vanderbilt University Office of Research support of the Radiochemistry Core Resource

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Potentiating anti-tumor immunity by inducing tumor inflammation and T cell-mediated responses are a promising area of cancer therapy. Immunomodulatory agents that promote these effects function via a wide variety of mechanisms, including upregulation of antigen presentation pathways. Here, we show that major histocompatibility class-I (MHC-I) genes are methylated in human breast cancers, suppressing their expression. Treatment of breast cancer cell lines with a next-generation hypomethylating agent, guadecitabine, upregulates MHC-I expression in response to interferon-gamma In murine tumor models of breast cancer, guadecitabine upregulates MHC-I in tumor cells promoting recruitment of CD8+ T cells to the microenvironment. Finally, we show that MHC-I genes are upregulated in breast cancer patients treated with hypomethylating agents. Thus, the immunomodulatory effects of hypomethylating agents likely involve upregulation of class-I antigen presentation to potentiate CD8+ T cell responses. These strategies may be useful to potentiate anti-tumor immunity and responses to checkpoint inhibition in immune-refractory breast cancers.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available