4.8 Article

High climate model dependency of Pliocene Antarctic ice-sheet predictions

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05179-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. European Research Council under the European Union's Seventh Framework Programme (FP7)/ERC [278636]
  2. European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [660814]
  3. NWO Earth and Life Sciences (ALW) [863.15.019]
  4. NWO-EW
  5. SurfSARA Computing and Networking Services
  6. Helmholtz graduate school GeoSim
  7. MAGIC-DML project through DFG [SPP 1158 (RO 4262/1-6)]
  8. University of Leeds HPC
  9. Past Earth Network (EPSRC) [EP/M008363/1]
  10. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [660814] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The mid-Pliocene warm period provides a natural laboratory to investigate the long-term response of the Earth's ice-sheets and sea level in a warmer-than-present-day world. Proxy data suggest that during the warm Pliocene, portions of the Antarctic ice-sheets, including West Antarctica could have been lost. Ice-sheet modelling forced by Pliocene climate model outputs is an essential way to improve our understanding of ice-sheets during the Pliocene. However, uncertainty exists regarding the degree to which results are model-dependent. Using climatological forcing from an international climate modelling intercomparison project, we demonstrate the high dependency of Antarctic ice-sheet volume predictions on the climate model-based forcing used. In addition, the collapse of the vulnerable marine basins of Antarctica is dependent on the ice-sheet model used. These results demonstrate that great caution is required in order to avoid making unsound statements about the nature of the Pliocene Antarctic ice-sheet based on model results that do not account for structural uncertainty in both the climate and ice sheet models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available