4.8 Article

Elucidating the genomic architecture of Asian EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma through multi-region exome sequencing

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02584-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Medical Research Council (Singapore) (NMRC) through the Translational and Clinical Research Program Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Targeting Cancer Stem Cell and Drug Resistance [NMRC/TCR/007-NCC/2013]
  2. Biomedical Research Council through the Strategic Positioning Fund Characterizing and Tracking Circulating Tumor Cells (CTCs) for Individualized Cancer Care
  3. Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science Technology and Research
  4. NRMC clinician-scientist award [NMRC/CSA/007/2016]
  5. Trailblazer Foundation Ltd.
  6. Singapore Millenium Foundation
  7. National Cancer Centre Research Fund [NRFMP10111-10112]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinomas (LUAD) display diverse clinical trajectories and are characterized by rapid but short-lived responses to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Through sequencing of 79 spatially distinct regions from 16 early stage tumors, we show that despite low mutation burdens, EGFR-mutant Asian LUADs unexpectedly exhibit a complex genomic landscape with frequent and early whole-genome doubling, aneuploidy, and high clonal diversity. Multiple truncal alterations, including TP53 mutations and loss of CDKN2A and RB1, converge on cell cycle dysregulation, with late sector-specific high-amplitude amplifications and deletions that potentially beget drug resistant clones. We highlight the association between genomic architecture and clinical phenotypes, such as co-occurring truncal drivers and primary TKI resistance. Through comparative analysis with published smoking-related LUAD, we postulate that the high intra-tumor heterogeneity observed in Asian EGFR-mutant LUAD may be contributed by an early dominant driver, genomic instability, and low background mutation rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available