4.8 Article

Order enables efficient electron-hole separation at an organic heterojunction with a small energy loss

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02457-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. KAUST Competitive Research Grant Program
  2. Department of the Navy, Office of Naval Research [N00014-14-1-0580, N00014-16-1-25200]
  3. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  4. Winton Programme for the Physics of Sustainability
  5. EPSRC [EP/M006360/1, EP/M005143/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. STFC [ST/M007073/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M005143/1, 1641842, EP/M006360/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M007073/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Donor-acceptor organic solar cells often show low open-circuit voltages (V-OC) relative to their optical energy gap (E-g) that limit power conversion efficiencies to similar to 12%. This energy loss is partly attributed to the offset between E-g and that of intermolecular charge transfer (CT) states at the donor-acceptor interface. Here we study charge generation occurring in PIPCP: PC61BM, a system with a very low driving energy for initial charge separation (E-g-E-CT similar to 50 meV) and a high internal quantum efficiency (eta(IQE) similar to 80%). We track the strength of the electric field generated between the separating electron-hole pair by following the transient electroabsorption optical response, and find that while localised CT states are formed rapidly (<100 fs) after photoexcitation, free charges are not generated until 5 ps after photo-generation. In PIPCP:PC61BM, electronic disorder is low (Urbach energy <27 meV) and we consider that free charge separation is able to outcompete trap-assisted non-radiative recombination of the CT state.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available