4.8 Article

Srf destabilizes cellular identity by suppressing cell-type-specific gene expression programs

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03748-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CREST, JST
  2. Core Center for iPS Cell Research, Research Center Network for Realization of Regenerative Medicine from Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development, AMED
  3. Takeda Science Foundation
  4. Naito Foundation
  5. World Premier International Research Center Initiative (WPI)
  6. iPS Cell Research Fund
  7. Japanese Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI [JP26830138, JP26840076]
  8. World-Leading Innovative Research and Development on Science and Technology (FIRST Program) of JSPS
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H01222, 15H05581, 16H01321, 16H05042] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multicellular organisms consist of multiple cell types. The identity of these cells is primarily maintained by cell-type-specific gene expression programs; however, mechanisms that suppress these programs are poorly defined. Here we show that serum response factor (Srf), a transcription factor that is activated by various extracellular stimuli, can repress cell-type specific genes and promote cellular reprogramming to pluripotency. Manipulations that decrease beta-actin monomer quantity result in the nuclear accumulation of Mkl1 and the activation of Srf, which downregulate cell-type-specific genes and alter the epigenetics of regulatory regions and chromatin organization. Mice overexpressing Srf exhibit various pathologies including an ulcerative colitis-like symptom and a metaplasia-like phenotype in the pancreas. Our results demonstrate an unexpected function of Srf via a mechanism by which extracellular stimuli actively destabilize cell identity and suggest Srf involvement in a wide range of diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available