4.8 Article

Perovskite seeding growth of formamidinium-lead-iodide-based perovskites for efficient and stable solar cells

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04029-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. King Abdullah University of Science and Technology (KAUST) [KUS-11-009-21]
  2. Ontario Research Fund Research Excellence Program
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC 51622201, 91733301, 61571015, 11327902, 51522201]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0300802, 2016YFA0300903]
  5. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [680-50-1511]
  6. Research Foundation Flanders (FWO)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Formamidinium-lead-iodide (FAPbI(3))-based perovskites with bandgap below 1.55 eV are of interest for photovoltaics in view of their close-to-ideal bandgap. Record-performance FAPbI(3)-based solar cells have relied on fabrication via the sequential-deposition method; however, these devices exhibit unstable output under illumination due to the difficulty of incorporating cesium cations (stabilizer) in sequentially deposited films. Here we devise a perovskite seeding method that efficiently incorporates cesium and beneficially modulates perovskite crystallization. First, perovskite seed crystals are embedded in the PbI2 film. The perovskite seeds serve as cesium sources and act as nuclei to facilitate crystallization during the formation of perovskite. Perovskite films with perovskite seeding growth exhibit a lowered trap density, and the resulting planar solar cells achieve stabilized efficiency of 21.5% with a high open-circuit voltage of 1.13 V and a fill factor that exceeds 80%. The Cs-containing FAPbI(3)-based devices show a striking improvement in operational stability and retain 60% of their initial efficiency after 140 h operation under one sun illumination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available