4.8 Article

Clinically compliant spatial and temporal imaging of chimeric antigen receptor T-cells

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-03524-1

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Medical Research Council
  2. Guy's and St Thomas Charity
  3. Worldwide Cancer Research
  4. Prostate Cancer UK
  5. Academy of Medical Sciences
  6. Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre at King's College London
  7. King's Health Partners/King's College London Cancer Research UK Cancer Centre
  8. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre based at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust and King's College London
  9. Breast Cancer Now
  10. MRC [MR/L006278/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  11. Medical Research Council [MR/L006278/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Medical Research Foundation [MRF-152-0002-STD-PAPA] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The unprecedented efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell immunotherapy of CD19+ B-cell malignancy has established a new therapeutic pillar of hematology-oncology. Nonetheless, formidable challenges remain for the attainment of comparable success in patients with solid tumors. To accelerate progress and rapidly characterize emerging toxicities, systems that permit the repeated and non-invasive assessment of CAR T-cell bio-distribution would be invaluable. An ideal solution would entail the use of a non-immunogenic reporter that mediates specific uptake of an inexpensive, non-toxic and clinically established imaging tracer by CAR T cells. Here we show the utility of the human sodium iodide symporter (hNIS) for the temporal and spatial monitoring of CAR T-cell behavior in a cancer-bearing host. This system provides a clinically compliant toolkit for high-resolution serial imaging of CAR T cells in vivo, addressing a fundamental unmet need for future clinical development in the field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available