4.8 Article

Single-cell full-length total RNA sequencing uncovers dynamics of recursive splicing and enhancer RNAs

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02866-0

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT) of Japan
  2. Japan Agency for Medical Research and development (AMED)
  3. Projects for Technological Development, Research Center Network for Realization of Regenerative Medicine by AMED
  4. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  5. JSPS KAKENHI [JP24651218, JP26640120]
  6. MEXT KAKENHI [221S0002]
  7. Special Postdoctoral Researchers Program from RIKEN
  8. JST CREST, Japan [JPMJCR16G3]
  9. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26640120] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Total RNA sequencing has been used to reveal poly(A) and non-poly(A) RNA expression, RNA processing and enhancer activity. To date, no method for full-length total RNA sequencing of single cells has been developed despite the potential of this technology for single-cell biology. Here we describe random displacement amplification sequencing (RamDA-seq), the first full-length total RNA-sequencing method for single cells. Compared with other methods, RamDA-seq shows high sensitivity to non-poly(A) RNA and near-complete full-length transcript coverage. Using RamDA-seq with differentiation time course samples of mouse embryonic stem cells, we reveal hundreds of dynamically regulated non-poly(A) transcripts, including histone transcripts and long noncoding RNA Neat1. Moreover, RamDA-seq profiles recursive splicing in >300-kb introns. RamDA-seq also detects enhancer RNAs and their cell type-specific activity in single cells. Taken together, we demonstrate that RamDA-seq could help investigate the dynamics of gene expression, RNA-processing events and transcriptional regulation in single cells.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available