4.5 Review

The diagnostic accuracy of methylation markers in urine for the detection of bladder cancer: a systematic review

Journal

EPIGENOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 673-687

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/epi-2017-0156

Keywords

biomarkers; methylation; molecular diagnostics; neoplasms; urinary bladder; urine analysis

Funding

  1. MDxHealth

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Several urinary hypermethylation-markers (hmDNA) have been described for bladder cancer (BC) detection, but none have been able to replace cystoscopy yet. We systematically reviewed and evaluated current literature on urinary hmDNA markers for BC diagnostics. Patients & methods: A systematic search of PubMed, EMBASE. com and The Cochrane Library up to February 2017 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines, was conducted. Results: A total of 30/ 42 studies included compared gene panels, with varying sensitivities (52-100%) and specificities (0-100%). Considerable heterogeneity across studies was observed and most was case-control studies. Conclusion: Reported diagnostic accuracy of urinary hmDNA for BC detection is highly variable and there is a lack of validation studies. Recent studies indicate that complementary markers are needed to allow for clinical implementation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available