4.5 Article

Nasal DNA methylation is associated with childhood asthma

Journal

EPIGENOMICS
Volume 10, Issue 5, Pages 629-641

Publisher

FUTURE MEDICINE LTD
DOI: 10.2217/epi-2017-0127

Keywords

air pollution; childhood asthma; DNA methylation; exposures; functional genomics analysis; histone marks; sibling study; transcriptional factor

Funding

  1. NIH/NIAID [R21AI119236, R21AI101375]
  2. NIH/NIEHS [P30-ES006096]
  3. ALA/AAAAI Respiratory Diseases Research Award [515708]
  4. Cincinnati Children's Hospital 'Center for Pediatric Genomics' pilot study award
  5. NIEHS [P30ES006096]
  6. CCHMC SFDA award
  7. CCHMC CReFF Award
  8. NIH/NINDS [R01NS099068]
  9. NIH/NHGRI Grant [R21HG008186]
  10. Center for Clinical and Translational Science and Training grant [UL1-RR026314-01 NCRR/NIH]
  11. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the NIH [UL1 TR001425]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: We aim to study DNA methylation (DNAm) variations associated with childhood asthma. Methods: Nasal DNAm was compared between sibling pairs discordant for asthma, 29 sib pairs for genome-wide association studies and 54 sib pairs for verification by pyrosequencing. Associations of methylation with asthma symptoms, allergy and environmental exposures were evaluated. In vitro experiments and functional genomic analyses were performed to explore biologic relevance. Results: Three CpGs were associated with asthma. cg14830002 was associated with allergies in nonasthmatics. cg23602092 was associated with asthma symptoms. cg14830002 and cg23602092 were associated with traffic-related air pollution exposure. Nearby genes were transcriptionally regulated by diesel exhaust, house dust mite and 5-aza-2 - deoxycytidine. Active chromatin marks and transcription factor binding were found around these sites. Conclusion: We identified novel DNAm variations associated with childhood asthma and suggested new disease-contributing epigenetic mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available