4.4 Article

Experimental study of epidermal growth factor and acidic fibroblast growth factor in the treatment of diabetic foot wounds

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue 6, Pages 5365-5370

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/etm.2018.6131

Keywords

diabetic foot wound; epidermal growth factor acidic fibroblast growth factor; wound healing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aini of the present study was to investigate the effect of epidermal growth factor (EOF) and acidic fibroblast growth factor (aFGF) on the healing of diabetic loot wounds. A total of 199 patients with diabetic foot ulcers were recruited and randomly divided into four groups: A recombinant human FOE group (n=50), an aFGF group (n=50), a combined EGF and aFGF group (n=50) and a normal saline control group (n=49). Patients in all groups received a daily dressing change and growth factor reagents were applied topically when dressing. To observe the time required for each stage of wound healing, the epidermal healing rate and granulation tissue growth were recorded. Following 3-4 days of treatment, the wound healing stage was similar in all groups. Later stages (following 4 days) of wound healing were achieved significantly faster in the combined group compared with the control group (P<0.05). The rate of wound healing in the FOE group was similar to that observed in the combination group. No significant difference was observed between the EGF and aFGF groups during the initial period of wound healing. However, in the later stage (following 4 days), the combined use of recombinant human ECF and aFGF had a marked positive effect on wound healing when compared with the control group. Growth factors have extensive biological activities with functions including promoting cell proliferation as well as rehabilitating and regenerating tissues, which serve important roles in wound healing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available