4.7 Article

PIK3CA mutations confer resistance to first-line chemotherapy in colorectal cancer

Journal

CELL DEATH & DISEASE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41419-018-0776-6

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81502283]
  2. Shinan District of Science and Technology Plan [2016-3-020-YY]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chemotherapy represents an important treatment option for colorectal cancer (CRC), but only half of the patients benefit from these regimens. We explored the potential predicting value and mechanism of PIK3CA mutation in CRC chemotherapy. CRC specimens from 440 patients were retrospectively collected and examined with a fluorescence PCR-based method. The correlation of first-line chemotherapy response and PIK3CA mutation was evaluated according to follow-up and medical records. The underlying mechanism of PIK3CA mutation in chemotherapy resistance was assessed with CRC tumors and primary cells. The mutation frequency of the PIK3CA gene in CRC patients was 9.55%, which was correlated with late TNM staging and lower histological grade. The CRC patients with PIK3A mutation showed worse response to first-line chemotherapy than those without PIK3CA mutation. PIK3A mutation tumor cells showed poor sensitivity to first-line chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo. PIK3CA mutation induced PI3K/Akt signaling activation to increase LGR5(+) CRC stem cells survival and proliferation, from which lead to chemotherapy resistance. Furthermore, PIK3CA (mutation)/LGR5(+) expression was an independent detrimental factor for CRC patients. Our findings indicated that PIK3CA mutation induced PI3K/Akt activation contributed to CRC stem cells survival and proliferation, from which cells further resistance to chemotherapy. PIK3CA (mutation)/LGR5(+) expression was a potential biomarker for monitoring chemotherapy resistance in CRC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available