4.7 Article

Antioxidant and angiotensin-I converting enzyme inhibitory activities of phenolic extracts and fractions derived from three phenolic-rich legume varieties

Journal

JOURNAL OF FUNCTIONAL FOODS
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 289-297

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jff.2017.12.060

Keywords

Legume; Phenolics; Purification; Fractionation; Identification; ACE inhibition; Antioxidant activity

Funding

  1. Mississippi Agriculture and Forestry Experimental Station
  2. INBRE-NIH award [4P20GM103476-15]
  3. USDA-ARS SCA Mississippi Center for Food Safety and Post-Harvest Technology [58-402-2729]
  4. Mississippi Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station [MIS 501170]
  5. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENERAL MEDICAL SCIENCES [P20GM103476] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lentil, black soybean and black turtle bean are commonly consumed legumes of different genera, containing high phenolic contents, which are effective antioxidants and angiotensin-I converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. However, these legumes' phenolic compositions and ACE inhibition ability have not been compared. Crude water extract (CE) was semi-purified (SPE) and fractionated using column chromatography. Results showed that purification and fractionation could substantially increase phenolic contents and antioxidant capacities. Heating and variety had great effect on phenolic substances, antioxidant potential and mass yield of extracts and fractions. Only crude extracts showed potent ACE inhibitory activity. Black turtle bean's ACE inhibition potential was largely reduced by cooking. The order from low to high in terms of ACE inhibitory activity was black turtle bean < lentil < black soybean. Identification and quantification of individual phenolic compounds by UV spectroscopy and LC-MSn analysis confirmed 18, 22, and 14 compounds, respectively, for the three legumes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available