3.8 Article

Th1 and Th17 immune responses to viable Propionibacterium acnes in patients with sarcoidosis

Journal

RESPIRATORY INVESTIGATION
Volume 50, Issue 3, Pages 104-109

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.resinv.2012.07.001

Keywords

Sarcoidosis; Propionibacterium acnes; Mycobacterium tuberculosis; Th1; Th17

Funding

  1. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Propionibacterium acnes and Mycobacterium tuberculosis have emerged as probable candidates responsible for sarcoidosis. This study was conducted to investigate the Th1/Th17 responses elicited by these pathogens in sarcoidosis and to clarify the causative role of these pathogens. Methods: Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) obtained from patients with sarcoidosis and from healthy volunteers were, respectively, co-cultured with viable P. acnes, with Bacille de Calmette et Guerin (BCG) as a viable M. tuberculosis complex, and with the early secretory antigenic target (ESAT)-6. Th1 cytokine production was measured using RT-PCR and enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assays, and interleukin (IL)-17 mRNA expression was measured by RT-PCR. Results: IL-2 secretion from PBMCs after stimulation with P. acnes was significantly higher in patients with sarcoidosis than in the controls. Similarly, IL-2 and IL-12 mRNA expression after stimulation with P. acnes was significantly higher in PBMCs from patients with sarcoidosis than in PBMCs from controls. In contrast, IL-17 mRNA expression was significantly lower in PBMCs from patients with sarcoidosis than in PBMCs from controls. No significant differences between the groups were observed in the responses to stimulation with BCG or ESAT-6. Conclusion: Sarcoidosis may arise from an imbalance of Th1/Th17 immune responses against viable P. acnes, but not M. tuberculosis complex. (C) 2012 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available