4.6 Article

Information, Technology, and Information Worker Productivity

Journal

INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH
Volume 23, Issue 3, Pages 849-867

Publisher

INFORMS
DOI: 10.1287/isre.1110.0408

Keywords

social networks; productivity; information worker; IT; multitasking; dynamic panel data; system GMM

Funding

  1. Direct For Computer & Info Scie & Enginr
  2. Div Of Information & Intelligent Systems [0953832] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  3. Direct For Social, Behav & Economic Scie
  4. Divn Of Social and Economic Sciences [0925004] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We econometrically evaluate information worker productivity at a midsize executive recruiting firm and assess whether the knowledge that workers accessed through their electronic communication networks enabled them to multitask more productively. We estimate dynamic panel data models of multitasking, knowledge networks, and productivity using several types of micro-level data: (a) direct observation of more than 125,000 email messages over a period of 10 months; (b) detailed accounting data on individuals' project output and team membership for more than 1,300 projects spanning five years; and (c) survey and interview data about the same workers' IT skills, IT use, and information sharing. We find that (1) more multitasking is associated with more project output, but diminishing marginal returns, and (2) recruiters whose network contacts have heterogeneous knowledge an even distribution of expertise over many project types are less productive on average but more productive when juggling diverse multitasking portfolios. These results show how multitasking affects productivity and how knowledge networks, enabled by IT, can improve worker performance. The methods developed can be replicated in other settings, opening new frontiers for research on social networks and IT value.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available