4.6 Article

Prognostic Value of Quantitative Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

Journal

JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING
Volume 11, Issue 5, Pages 686-694

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2017.07.022

Keywords

cardiac magnetic resonance; perfusion; prognosis; quantitative perfusion analysis

Funding

  1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre award
  2. King's College London
  3. NIHR Healthcare Technology Co-operative for Cardiovascular Disease at Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
  4. Centre of Excellence in Medical Engineering - Wellcome Trust
  5. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [WT088641/Z/09/Z]
  6. University College London Comprehensive Cancer Imaging Centre - Cancer Research UK
  7. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
  8. Medical Research Council
  9. Department of Health (England)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES This study sought to evaluate the prognostic usefulness of visual and quantitative perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) ischemic burden in an unselected group of patients and to assess the validity of consensus-based ischemic burden thresholds extrapolated from nuclear studies. BACKGROUND There are limited data on the prognostic value of assessing myocardial ischemic burden by CMR, and there are none using quantitative perfusion analysis. METHODS Patients with suspected coronary artery disease referred for adenosine-stress perfusion CMR were included (n = 395; 70% male; age 58 +/- 13 years). The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, aborted sudden death, and revascularization after 90 days. Perfusion scans were assessed visually and with quantitative analysis. Cross-validated Cox regression analysis and net reclassification improvement were used to assess the incremental prognostic value of visual or quantitative perfusion analysis over a baseline clinical model, initially as continuous covariates, then using accepted thresholds of >= 2 segments or >= 10% myocardium. RESULTS After a median 460 days (interquartile range: 190 to 869 days) follow-up, 52 patients reached the primary endpoint. At 2 years, the addition of ischemic burden was found to increase prognostic value over a baseline model of age, sex, and late gadolinium enhancement (baseline model area under the curve [AUC]: 0.75; visual AUC: 0.84; quantitative AUC: 0.85). Dichotomized quantitative ischemic burden performed better than visual assessment (net reclassification improvement 0.043 vs. 0.003 against baseline model). CONCLUSIONS This study was the first to address the prognostic benefit of quantitative analysis of perfusion CMR and to support the use of consensus-based ischemic burden thresholds by perfusion CMR for prognostic evaluation of patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Quantitative analysis provided incremental prognostic value to visual assessment and established risk factors, potentially representing an important step forward in the translation of quantitative CMR perfusion analysis to the clinical setting. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier on behalf of the American College of Cardiology Foundation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available