4.5 Article

Near-Optimal Thermal Monitoring Framework for Many-Core Systems-on-Chip

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMPUTERS
Volume 64, Issue 11, Pages 3197-3209

Publisher

IEEE COMPUTER SOC
DOI: 10.1109/TC.2015.2395423

Keywords

Sensor placement; thermal management; thermal monitoring

Funding

  1. ERC [247006]
  2. Nano-Tera YINS RTD project - Swiss Confederation [20NA21 150939]
  3. EC FP7 STREP GreenDataNet project [609000]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [247006] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Chip designers place on-chip thermal sensors to measure local temperatures, thus preventing thermal runaway situations in many-core processing architectures. However, the quality of the thermal reconstruction is directly dependent on the number of placed sensors, which should be minimized, while guaranteeing full detection of all the worst case temperature gradient. In this paper, we present an entire framework for the thermal management of complex many-core architectures, such that we can precisely recover the thermal distribution from a minimal number of sensors. The proposed sensor placement algorithm is guaranteed to reduce the impact of noisy measurements on the reconstructed thermal distribution. We achieve significant improvements compared to the state of the art, in terms of both computational complexity and reconstruction precision. For example, if we consider a 64 cores systems-on-chip with 64 noisy sensors (sigma(2) = 4), we achieve an average reconstruction error of 1.5 degrees C, that is less than half of what previous state-of-the-art methods achieve. We also study the practical limits of the proposed method and show that we do not need realistic workloads to learn the model and efficiently place the sensors. In fact, we show that the reconstruction error is not significantly increased if we randomly generate the power-traces of the components or if we have just a part of the correct workload.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available