4.6 Article

Modest ratios of fast food outlets to supermarkets and green grocers are associated with higher body mass index: Longitudinal analysis of a sample of 15,229 Australians aged 45 years and older in the Australian National Liveability Study

Journal

HEALTH & PLACE
Volume 49, Issue -, Pages 101-110

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2017.10.004

Keywords

Body mass index; Food environment; Multilevel growth curve modelling; Australia

Funding

  1. Australian Prevention Partnership Centre through the NHMRC partnership centre grant scheme [GNT9100001]
  2. Australian Government Department of Health
  3. NSW Ministry of Health
  4. ACT Health
  5. HCF
  6. HCF Research Foundation
  7. National Heart Foundation of Australia Fellowship [100948]
  8. NHMRC Boosting Dementia Research Leadership Fellowship [1140317]
  9. NHMRC project grant [1101065]
  10. NHMRC Principal Research Fellow Award [1004900]
  11. RMIT University Vice Chancellor's Senior Research Fellowship
  12. NHMRC Early Career Fellowship [1121035]
  13. VicHealth
  14. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Centre of Excellence in Healthy Liveable Communities [1061404]
  15. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1101065, 1140317, 1121035] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Food purchasing decisions are made within the context of the range of options available, yet most epidemiological studies focus upon single outlet types. Ratios of fast food outlets to supermarkets and green grocers were linked to addresses of 15,229 adults in the 45 and Up Study at baseline (2006-2008) and followup (2009-2010). Compared to having no fast food outlet but having healthy food outlets within 3.2 km from home, multilevel growth curves revealed that relative exposure > 25% fast food outlets were associated with 0.36-1.19 kg/m(2) higher BMI (p < 0.05). These associations were consistent as people aged. No associations were observed for food outlets < 0.8 km.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available