4.4 Article

Modified inelastic bouncing ball model of the Brazil nut effect and its reverse

Journal

GRANULAR MATTER
Volume 20, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10035-018-0821-2

Keywords

Granular segregation; Brazil nut effect; Vibration; Bouncing ball; Bifurcation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We developed the modified inelastic bouncing ball model (mIBBM) to describe the emergence of the Brazil nut effect (BNE) and its reverse (RBNE) in a vertically-vibrated binary granular mixture. The mIBBM incorporates the container-to-grains force-transmission efficiency (transmissibility) T (r) to quantify the dimensionless mean void lifetime that acts as the segregation phase indicator where omega is the vibration angular frequency. The mixture is represented as two non-interacting inelastic balls, Ball A and Ball B. Each ball bounces with a time-of-flight tau (A) (or tau (B) ) that depends on transmissibility T (rA) (or T (rB) ) and the dimensionless container acceleration I, i.e., tau (A) = tau (A) (I, T (rA) ) and tau (B) = tau (B) (I, T (rB) ). The ball dynamics are described by the bifurcation diagrams of the dimensionless times-of-flight, omega tau (A) (I, T (rA) ) and omega tau (B) (I, T (rB) ). The probability-weighted difference between branches of the two diagrams is computed and interpreted as follows: (occurrence of BNE), (RBNE) and = 0 (no segregation). Segregation phases are revealed as varying shifts and widths of across the I axis. The phase boundaries in the -versus-I diagram are sensitive to changes in T (rA) , T (rB) and Delta T (r) = (T (rA) - T (rB) ). The mIBBM explains why the BNE is a more likely than the RBNE and predicts a segregation phase sequence that is generally consistent with related experimental results taken over a limited omega-range. Additional experiments are needed to enable a more comprehensive and precise evaluation of the mIBBM.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available