4.6 Review

The Hard Way towards an Antibody-Based HIV-1 Env Vaccine: Lessons from Other Viruses

Journal

VIRUSES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/v10040197

Keywords

HIV-1; vaccine; Env; broadly neutralizing antibodies; structure-based reverse vaccinology; epitope vaccine; vectored vaccine; adeno-associated viruses (AAV)

Categories

Funding

  1. Federal Ministry of Health
  2. Ministry of Higher Education, Science and the Arts from Hesse
  3. German Center for Infection Research (DZIF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although effective antibody-based vaccines have been developed against multiple viruses, such approaches have so far failed for the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). Despite the success of anti-retroviral therapy (ART) that has turned HIV-1 infection into a chronic disease and has reduced the number of new infections worldwide, a vaccine against HIV-1 is still urgently needed. We discuss here the major reasons for the failure of classical vaccine approaches, which are mostly due to the biological properties of the virus itself. HIV-1 has developed multiple mechanisms of immune escape, which also account for vaccine failure. So far, no vaccine candidate has been able to induce broadly neutralizing antibodies (bnAbs) against primary patient viruses from different clades. However, such antibodies were identified in a subset of patients during chronic infection and were shown to protect from infection in animal models and to reduce viremia in first clinical trials. Their detailed characterization has guided structure-based reverse vaccinology approaches to design better HIV-1 envelope (Env) immunogens. Furthermore, conserved Env epitopes have been identified, which are promising candidates in view of clinical applications. Together with new vector-based technologies, considerable progress has been achieved in recent years towards the development of an effective antibody-based HIV-1 vaccine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available