3.8 Article

LESS GOOD BUT NOT BAD: IN DEFENSE OF EPICUREANISM ABOUT DEATH

Journal

PACIFIC PHILOSOPHICAL QUARTERLY
Volume 93, Issue 2, Pages 197-227

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0114.2012.01423.x

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article I defend innocuousism - a weak form of Epicureanism about the putative badness of death. I argue that if we assume both mental statism about wellbeing and that death is an experiential blank, it follows that death is not bad for the one who dies. I defend innocuousism against the deprivation account of the badness of death. I argue that something is extrinsically bad if and only if it leads to states that are intrinsically bad. On my view, sometimes dying may be less good than living, but it is never bad to die.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available