4.4 Article

A Zebrafish Heart Failure Model for Assessing Therapeutic Agents

Journal

ZEBRAFISH
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 243-253

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2017.1546

Keywords

zebrafish; heart failure; verapamil; cardiovascular diseases

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Key Science & Technology Project Grant [2014C03009]
  2. National Key Science and Technology Project Grant of the 12th 5-year program of China [2011ZX09301-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Heart failure is a leading cause of death and the development of effective and safe therapeutic agents for heart failure has been proven challenging. In this study, taking advantage of larval zebrafish, we developed a zebrafish heart failure model for drug screening and efficacy assessment. Zebrafish at 2 dpf (days postfertilization) were treated with verapamil at a concentration of 200M for 30min, which were determined as optimum conditions for model development. Tested drugs were administered into zebrafish either by direct soaking or circulation microinjection. After treatment, zebrafish were randomly selected and subjected to either visual observation and image acquisition or record videos under a Zebralab Blood Flow System. The therapeutic effects of drugs on zebrafish heart failure were quantified by calculating the efficiency of heart dilatation, venous congestion, cardiac output, and blood flow dynamics. All 8 human heart failure therapeutic drugs (LCZ696, digoxin, irbesartan, metoprolol, qiliqiangxin capsule, enalapril, shenmai injection, and hydrochlorothiazide) showed significant preventive and therapeutic effects on zebrafish heart failure (p<0.05, p<0.01, and p<0.001) in the zebrafish model. The larval zebrafish heart failure model developed and validated in this study could be used for in vivo heart failure studies and for rapid screening and efficacy assessment of preventive and therapeutic drugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available