4.5 Article

Effect of steam explosion on physicochemical properties of waste activated sludge and the performance of anaerobic digestion

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 11, Pages 2687-2698

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2018.227

Keywords

anaerobic digestion; biogas production; pretreatment; steam explosion; waste activated sludge

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51678280, 51708253]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [JUSRP51633B]
  3. National Key Technology R& D Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology [2014BAD24B03-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The effect of steam explosion on physicochemical properties of sludge and the performance of anaerobic digestion (AD) was investigated. The steam explosion was conducted under different combinations of temperature and time, ranging 151-198 degrees C and 4-12 min respectively. The capillary suction time (CST) and viscosity of the sludge was increased with particle size decreased by improved hydrolysis temperature and prolonged hydrolysis time. The best sludge solubilization achieved was 41.3% under pretreatment condition of 198 degrees C and 4 min. Biogas production was enhanced with the improved sludge solubilization, and a linear correlation was found between biogas production and the severity factor (logR(0)) of steam explosion. However, the biogas productivity was reduced when the logR(0) was increased from 3.79 to 3.96, probably owing to the generation of refractory organics during the high severity pretreatment. The temperature of 198 degrees C and the time of 8 min were the recommended operation parameters of steam explosion pretreatment for sludge AD, which could improve biogas production by 99.7 mL/g VSfed. The pH and NH4+-N during sludge AD was increased by steam explosion pretreatment; however, no inhibition on biogas production was observed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available