4.5 Article

Effects of recirculation and separation times on nitrogen removal in baffled membrane bioreactor (B-MBR)

Journal

WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 12, Pages 2803-2811

Publisher

IWA PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2018.270

Keywords

baffled membrane bioreactor; nitrification/denitrification in a single reaction tank; recirculation intensity; simultaneous removal of organic matter and nutrients; wastewater treatment

Funding

  1. 'Program to promote R&D bridging to SMEs' by New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO), Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we investigated the effects of recirculation and separation times on removals of organic matter, nitrogen, and phosphorus in a baffled membrane bioreactor (B-MBR) treating real municipal wastewater. A pilot-scale B-MBR experimental apparatus was operated under two different sets of recirculation and separation times. The results revealed that, irrespective of operating conditions, the biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and concentration of total nitrogen (T-N) in the treated water can be lowered to less than 3 and 5 mg/L, respectively. Although T-N was effectively removed in the two different operating conditions, increase in the fraction of recirculation time results in tiny deterioration of nitrogen removal efficiency in the B-MBR. Phosphorus removal efficiency was also slightly decreased as the fraction of recirculation time (ratio between recirculation and separation times) was increased. The results of the measurement of dissolved oxygen (DO) profiles at different points of the B-MBR apparatus indicate that the increase in DO concentration in the anoxic zone of the B-MBR becomes much more pronounced by increasing recirculation intensity. On the basis of the results obtained in this study, it can be concluded that efficient removal of BOD, T-N, and total phosphorus can be achieved by the B-MBR as long as appropriate recirculation intensity is selected.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available