4.7 Article

Conditioning a Hydrologic Model Using Patterns of Remotely Sensed Land Surface Temperature

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 2976-2998

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017WR021346

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Alliance EDA-Remote Sensing and Earth System Dynamics, through the Initiative and Networking Fund of the Helmholtz Association, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hydrologic models are usually calibrated using observed river runoff at catchment outlets. Streamflow, however, represents an integral response of the entire catchment and is observed at a few locations worldwide. Parameter estimation based on streamflow has the disadvantage that it does not consider the spatiotemporal variability of hydrologic states and fluxes such as evapotranspiration. Remotely sensed data, in contrast, include these variabilities and are broadly available. In this study, we assess the predictive skill of satellite-derived land surface temperature (T-s) with respect to river runoff (Q). We developed a bias-insensitive pattern-matching criterion to focus the parameter optimization on spatial patterns of T-s. The proposed method is extensively tested in six distinct large German river basins and cross validated in 222 additional basins in Germany. We conclude that land surface temperature calibration outperforms random drawn parameter sets, which could be meaningful for calibrating hydrologic models in ungauged locations. A combined calibration with Q and T-s reduces the root mean squared error in the predicted evapotranspiration by 8% compared to flux tower observations but reduces the NSEs of the streamflow predictions by 6% on average for the six large basins. Our results show that patterns of Ts better constrain model parameters when considered in a calibration next to Q, which finally reduces parametric uncertainty.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available