4.7 Article

A Computational Fluid-Dynamics Assessment of the Improved Performance of Aerodynamic Rain Gauges

Journal

WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH
Volume 54, Issue 2, Pages 779-796

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1002/2017WR020549

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Innovate UK Knowledge Transfer Partnership'' scheme [KTP009229]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The airflow surrounding any catching-type rain gauge when impacted by wind is deformed by the presence of the gauge body, resulting in the acceleration of wind above the orifice of the gauge, which deflects raindrops and snowflakes away from the collector (the wind-induced undercatch). The method of mounting a gauge with the collector at or below the level of the ground, or the use of windshields to mitigate this effect, is often not practicable. The physical shape of a gauge has a significant impact on its collection efficiency. In this study, we show that appropriate aerodynamic shapes are able to reduce the deformation of the airflow, which can reduce undercatch. We have employed computational fluid-dynamic simulations to evaluate the time-averaged airflow realized around aerodynamic rain gauge shapes when impacted by wind. Terms of comparison are provided by the results obtained for two standard conventional rain gauge shapes. The simulations have been run for different wind speeds and are based on a time-averaged Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes model. The shape of the aerodynamic gauges is shown to have a positive impact on the time-averaged airflow patterns observed around the orifice compared to the conventional shapes. Furthermore, the turbulent air velocity fields for the aerodynamic shapes present recirculating structures, which may improve the particle-catching capabilities of the gauge collector.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available