4.5 Article Proceedings Paper

Multiplex hydrolysis-probe assay for the simultaneous detection of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi infections in equids

Journal

VETERINARY PARASITOLOGY
Volume 255, Issue -, Pages 61-68

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2018.03.022

Keywords

Theileria equi; Babesia caballi; Real-time PCR

Funding

  1. South African National Research Foundation
  2. JE Biliary Disease Trust fund
  3. Joy Liebenberg Trust fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Quantitative real-time PCR assays previously developed for the detection of Theileria equi and Babesia caballi, were combined in a single multiplex TaqMan qPCR platform for the simultaneous detection of both heamo-protozoan parasites in equids. The multiplex equine piroplasmosis (M-EP) qPCR assay was shown to be efficient and specific. The detection limit was determined to be 1.4 x 10(-4) % parasitized erythrocytes (PE) for T. equi and 2.8 x 10(-4) % PE for B. caballi. The effect of differential DNA concentrations on the outcome of the M-EP qPCR for each target species was also investigated. The data demonstrated that the assay could reliably detect both targets, over a range of at least 1000-fold difference in target concentrations, without loss of sensitivity. The assay was subsequently evaluated on 243 field samples collected from areas where limited tick control strategies were implemented. The IFAT detected circulating T. equi and B. caballi antibodies in 100% and 92% of the samples, respectively. The M-EP qPCR assay detected T. equi parasite DNA in 98% of the samples, while B. caballi could only be detected in 6% of the samples tested, confirming that B. caballi infections generally occur at extremely low parasitaemias that rarely exceed 1%. The developed M-EP qPCR assay therefore serves as a reliable tool for the rapid diagnosis and epidemiological survey of equine piroplasmosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available